AUDIT COMMITTEES, D&O, BUSINESS, COMPLIANCE, RISK, AUDITING, INVESTIGATIONS & LITIGATION

David W. Tate, Esq. – Litigation and Trials; D&O, Boards and Audit Committees; Liability; Duties; Risk Management; Compliance; Investigations; Accountants, Auditors & Practices; Insurance Coverage & Bad Faith; Accountings; Public Companies, Private Companies (Closely Held and Family Owned), Nonprofits & Governmental Entities. My Other Blog-http://californiaestatetrust.com-Trust, Estate, Conservatorship And Elder Abuse Litigation, And Administrations. San Francisco/California.

Menu

Skip to content

Click on this link for information about David W. Tate, Esq. and a PDF copy of Tate’s Excellent Audit Committee Guide – Contact Email: davetateesq@gmail.com – Disclaimer. This blog and website are public sources of general information concerning our firm and its lawyers, and the information presented. They are intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete and up-to-date. This blog and website are not intended to be and are not sources of advertising, solicitation or legal advice. Links on this blog and website are not intended to be and are not referrals or endorsements of the linked entities or information. The lawyers identified on this website are licensed to practice law in the State of California and nowhere else – the firm and the lawyers are not intend to represent and do not represent anyone desiring representation in a state where this blog and website fail to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state. The materials and information on this blog and website do not apply to any particular person or situation and do not apply to you or to your situation. You need to consult with an attorney or other professional for your specific situation.

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB): Selected Auditing Developments | The National Law Review

Posted on October 2, 2014 by David Tate, Esq.

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has adopted Auditing Standard No. 18, Related Parties (AS 18), addressing related party transactions, as well as related amendments addressing significant unusual transactions and transactions with executive officers.

Click on the following link for the article: www.natlawreview.com

Share this:

X
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email
Print
Pinterest
Tumblr
Reddit
Pocket

Like Loading...

This entry was posted in audit committee, auditing, auditor, board, CEO, CFO, compliance, D&O, director, executive, general counsel, governance, internal auditor, liability, risk committee, risk management. Bookmark the permalink.

Post navigation

← Could computers take over the boardroom?

Board members keenly focused on risk →

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Δ

Search

Dave Tate, Esq.

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:

Join 287 other subscribers

Recent Posts

California Equal Pay Act
I AM CHANGING THIS BLOG’S WEBSITE URL TO AUDITCOMMITTEEUPDATE.COM
In Anchorage, AK For A Few Days – Picture Of The Mountains
SEC.gov | J.P. Morgan to Pay $267 Million for Disclosure Failures
Five 2015 Headlines That Had High Implications for Internal Auditing
Risk Reporting to the Board
SEC.gov | SEC Proposes New Derivatives Rules for Registered Funds and Business Development Companies
Audit Committees – Setting Up An Internal Audit Function – From The IIA, With Comments
Tate’s Excellent Audit Committee Guide – Updated October 2015 – 172 pages – Enjoy, Use, and Pass It Along
Managing Risk: Panel Finds Lawyers are Essential at the Board Level

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Comment
Reblog
Subscribe Subscribed
- AUDIT COMMITTEES, D&O, BUSINESS, COMPLIANCE, RISK, AUDITING, INVESTIGATIONS & LITIGATION
- Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

%d