Tensions rising in bank boardrooms as OSFI’s new rules blur boundaries

Directors are being asked to do more than can be or should be expected of them, insiders say, and that is causing friction with management

Click on the following for the article: business.financialpost.com

Talking about Canada, but true for the U.S. also.  Historically a director’s oversight responsibilities have been rather lacking in specifics.  But that has been changing, first with the audit committee, then in certain industries such as banking, and more recently in topic areas such as cybersecurity.  Don’t expect it to go back to the historical approach.  Instead, with starts and stops, expect that oversight responsibilities will become more specific as regulators and stakeholders push the perceived need to be – overall, within specific industries, and within specific topic areas.  The problem for directors and executive officers – what to do, how much to do, how often to do, and when is enough, particularly when actions are mostly viewed or criticized in hindsight after negative unexpected events occur.  And with the risk of risk management, COSO 2013 and other events it will be interesting to see how not only the regulators but also the outside and internal auditors adjust and react.

Dave Tate, CPA, Esq. (San Francisco / California)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s